Dear Jon
Even though I wish I was at the Rallies for Sanity and Fear today in Washington D.C., that desire to be there is more for the fact that The Daily Show and The Colbert Report are funny shows and I enjoy watching them, and so a rally based on them, will most likely be ridiculous and hysterical. My desire to go isn't much of a political desire, after all, even though The Daily Show is about politics, it is not really supposed to be about politics, but about making jokes. Jon Stewart has shown regularly over the years, that he is a comedian and he has no political loyalties. Even though it is obvious he is more liberal than conservative, more Democrative than Republican, the worst thing you can do is approach him as if he should be on one side of the issue or the other, because then the comedian in him will want to irk you by completely bashing the things you thought he should respect.
I can understand Jon Stewart not wanting to be reduced to a liberal fire-thrower or water-carrier, but one thing that makes me frustrated is his and much of the mainstream media's "false equivalency" thesis, where both Left and Right are the same, and both have their extremists and since they balance each other out, neither can have any real truth to their claims. Stewart regularly does this, by showing the insanity of Tea Party activists against globalization or neo-liberal and CODEPINK activists. He pretends, like so many others that MSNBC and Fox News are the same thing just for different parties or ideologies, which an objective analysis shows is far from the truth. Jon Stewart always complains that he has to watch so much Fox News each day, and so if that is true, than he should know that while both channels have their ideologues and have their commentators who are more about starting fires than showing evidence, Fox News, as a much better propaganda machine is far less interested in either "the country" or the "truth" than MSNBC. But that is one of the interesting things about Stewart which irritates liberals. Because Fox is almost too obviously partisan and cannot be anything but partisan, and can't even put up the appearance of being antagonistic to those they are supposed to valorize, Stewart claims that they are at least more "honest" about their propaganda, at least they don't have any pretense to being anything else but a Republican conservative tea party free back rub machine. The problem with that of course is that Fox News still clings to the name "fair and balanced" and still pretends to be a real news organization and so while this is an interesting talking point, it isn't much an analysis.
All of this shows why Jon Stewart might admire Barack Obama, because of the centrism and pragmatism of both of them. Although Stewart has regularly attacked Obama for the past two years for not coming through on his promises for "hope" and "change" Stewart must enjoy Obama's rhetoric which he and his administration use against the more liberal and critical elements of his base, namely that he is not the President of the Liberal United States or of the Democrats of the United States, but of everyone, and so he cannot simply take one side of the issue, but has to evaluate and compromise. I think Jon Stewart sees himself in a similar way, feeling, in the most serious bone he has in his body, which he often keeps hidden for obvious reasons, as someone in the center of a crazy, political pundit world. Someone who might feel the pull to be more partisan, to just talk about one side, support one side and demonize the other, but as someone who is watched for several million people regularly, he just can't. It is one of those political disconnects, the feeling of responsibility to not just those that love you, but those that you are supposed to serve. Of course, it's weird for him to take on that role, since he is not at all a serious news person, but literally a fake-news-person, but I guess he figures (ironic Jewish reference coming) that such is his cross to bear.
I'm posting below a letter to Jon Stewart from CODEPINK organizer Medea Benjamin, who was on his show for a few seconds last week before the rally, as an implicit example of the kind of people they don't want at the Rally this weekend.
*******************************
by Medea Benjamin
from Commondreams.org
10/29/10
When Jon Stewart was on Larry King's show talking about his Rally to Restore Sanity, he likened himself to Alice in Wonderland and the rally as the Mad Hatter Tea Party. But is Jon Stewart really Alice, trying to find sanity in an upside-down world? Or is he the March Hare, the ultimate "slacktivist" who thinks it's always teatime -- time to sit back and jibberjabber?
The 10-30-10 rally on the capital's mall is looking more and more like a celebration of "slacktivism." Stewart is courting people who do not want to open their window and yell, "I'm mad as hell, and I'm not going to take it anymore!" As he says in the Rally for Sanity website, he's looking for the people who've been "too busy to go to rallies, who actually have lives and families and jobs (or are looking for jobs)."
So let's get this straight: people who were so horrified when the U.S. invaded Iraq that they joined millions of others to protest are not sane? We shouldn't speak out against Wall Street bankers whose greed led to millions of Americans losing their jobs and homes? It's irrational to be angry when you see the Gulf of Mexico covered in oil because BP cut corners on safety? Don't get upset when the Supreme Court rules that corporations are people and can pour unlimited funds into our elections?
Stewart often roasts the warmakers and corporate fatcats on his show, but he seems to think that his viewers should be content to take out their frustrations with a good belly laugh.
So we started a facebook page asking Jon Stewart to invite us on the show to set the record straight. Beware of what you ask for. We did, indeed, get a call from the producers but it was not for a live interview with Jon Stewart. No, it was for a taped session with myself, a Tea Party organizer and a tear-gas dodging, anti-globalization anarchist "giving advice" to Daily Show's Samantha Bee about how to organize a good rally. It was clear they wanted to portray us as the crazy folks who should not come to their rally for reasonableness.
I consulted with my CODEPINK colleagues. Some said, "Don't do it. It's a trap and will only further marginalize us." We'd already been ridiculed several times on the show, like when we stood up to question General Petraeus at a Congressional hearing or when we organized protests at the Marine Recruiting Center in Berkeley. But the majority of my colleagues thought it would be crazy to decline the chance to get an anti-war message out to millions of viewers.
The producers told us to come to the New York studio "in costume." The anarchist, Legba Carrefour, was all in black, including a black bandanna covering his face. The Tea Partier, Jeffrey Weingarten, came in patriotic red, white and blue. I decided to "go professional," with a CODEPINK t-shirt and a gray suit. The producers were disappointed. They had wanted me to appear in one of the wild outfits we have worn in Congress -- like a hand-lettered pink slip accessorized with a hot-pink boa and a glittery "no war" tiara.
But my attempt to look professional was thwarted by the fourth guest who suddenly appeared and was positioned right behind me: A huge, scary puppet head of Iranian President Ahmadinejad.
So there we were, four "crazies" being quizzed by Samantha Bee for over two hours. She started out with softballs -- what did we stand for, what activities did we engage in. Then the questions and the antics got sillier and sillier. By the end we found ourselves spinning a blind-folded Samantha Bee around, then watching her swing a baseball bat at Ahmadinejad's head to see if it was really a pinata.
I'm sure that with over two hours of tape, there will be plenty of footage to turn into a four-minute segment showing us as a bunch of nutcases. After all, it is a comedy show.
But it's too bad that Jon Stewart, the liberal comedian, is putting anti-war activists, tea partiers and black bloc anarchists in the same bag. And it's sad that he's telling his audience -- many of whom are young progressive thinkers -- that activism is crazy.
An anonymous assistant on the Daily Show's blog chastized CODEPINK on line. "Dipping hands in fake blood or screaming over everyone just makes you look crazy and then the rest of the country ignores you." He said that we should, instead, focus on solutions.
CODEPINK has been proposing solutions since the day we started. We risked our lives meeting with UN weapons inspectors in Iraq right before the U.S. invaded to see if war could be avoided. We have repeatedly traveled to Afghanistan to push for reconciliation. For the past eight years we have been posing solutions about how to deal with terrorism, how to extricate ourselves from the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, how to make us safer at home. Whether under Bush or Obama, our voices of sanity have been drowned out by a war machine that makes billions selling weapons and hiring mercenaries.
Meanwhile, we've witnessed the agony of mothers who have lost their sons in these senseless wars, the unspeakable suffering of our friends in Iraq and Afghanistan, and the lavish spending on war while our schools and hospitals are gutted.
It was because of this insanity that we began to interrupt the war criminals during their public appearances, shouting -- yes, shouting -- for an end to the madness. It was because of this insanity that we put fake blood on our hands to represent the hundreds of thousands of innocents who died as result of their lies. In our post-9/11 24/7 news cycle, we learned that the more audacious and outrageous the action, the more likely we were to get our anti-war message into the national conversation.
For this the Daily Show calls us crazy!
Don't get me wrong. CODEPINK women love to laugh and we try not to take ourselves too seriously. But we do feel that it's the sane people who protest crazy wars, who cry out against the dangers of global warming, who rail against big money in politics, who implore our politicians to spend our resources rebuilding America, not bombing people overseas.
So let's celebrate the people who walk the talk. Slacktivism did not end slavery, activism did. Slacktivism did not get women our rights. Activism did. Slacktivism won't end war or global warming. But activism just might.
Jon Stewart says he wants to restore sanity to Washington; so do we. We'll see you out on the mall, Jon.
Medea Benjamin is cofounder of CODEPINK and Global Exchange. CODEPINK will be organizing a Mad Hatter Tea Party at the Rally to Restore Sanity.
Comments
A go along, to get along dog and pony show.
The circus continues while the Empire agenda marches on.
It matters not who sits in the white house.
They [TPTB] select so that we may elect.
This is just another tag team example of wishing for the lesser of two evils.
Demons have a way of changing their masks, names, hats, and lapel pins.
The real dream of hope died [was killed] decades ago.