Letter from Joseph E. Rivera
Ti katoliko yu', gof ti katoliko yu'. Lao hu komprende na hagas gof tahdong i hinenggen katoliko gi kutturan Chamoru. Put este, ti hu despresia i Chamorro siha ni' manmanhohongge gi i gima'yu'us katoliko. Para meggai na Chamorro siha, yan-niha i gima'yu'us katoliko ti put i pinayon-niha ha', lao yan-niha sa' ti gof mappot luma'la katoliko giya Guahan. Guaha meggai na areklamento gi i gima'yu'us, lao ti manstriku. Guaha misa, gupot yan dinana' siha, ya este i Chamorro ma gof gogosa. Achokka' mumosmisa hao un biahi kada sakkan, katotoliko ha'. Ya gaigaige ha' i kustumbre siha achokka' tataigue ha' hao gi i gima'yu'us.
I halacha' na yinaoyao gi gima'yu'us put i tinilaika siha desde un nuebu na gurupu umannok gi halom i gima'yu'us. Ti hu gof komprende i chi-na siha este na mimu. Lao hu tungo' na meggai manlinayo' put i bidada-na i Maga'obispo. Ti ha fa'taotaotao hun i taotao gi halom i gima'yu'us, ya ha fa'sasanghe' hun ayu i ti ya-na este na nuebu na gurupu yan i kustumbren-niha. Ti hu tungo' kao magahet este na inakusa siha, lao hu tungo' na magahet i pinitin i taotao. Hu tungo' na i dos na pale' ni' mafa'takpapa' gof maguaiya gi kumunidat.
Hu sodda' este na kata gi i blog JungleWatch. I pine'lo siha gi este na blog, ma sen aguiguiyi unu na banda gi yinaoyao, lao meggai na infotmasion sinembatgo.
***********************
December 17, 2014
On this subject, I believe I am more than qualified to speak, as it has been my profession for well over 35 years. As you know, for the last thirteen years, I have been entrusted as the Chief Financial Officer of Calvo Enterprises, the largest locally owned company in Guam. Prior to that, I worked in the public sector as Director of the Bureau of Budget Management and Research for the Government of Guam, serving as the Chief Financial Advisor for three governors of Guam. In all of my previous positions, I have enjoyed the complete trust of my employers, who knew that I would always give my best professional advice.
I halacha' na yinaoyao gi gima'yu'us put i tinilaika siha desde un nuebu na gurupu umannok gi halom i gima'yu'us. Ti hu gof komprende i chi-na siha este na mimu. Lao hu tungo' na meggai manlinayo' put i bidada-na i Maga'obispo. Ti ha fa'taotaotao hun i taotao gi halom i gima'yu'us, ya ha fa'sasanghe' hun ayu i ti ya-na este na nuebu na gurupu yan i kustumbren-niha. Ti hu tungo' kao magahet este na inakusa siha, lao hu tungo' na magahet i pinitin i taotao. Hu tungo' na i dos na pale' ni' mafa'takpapa' gof maguaiya gi kumunidat.
Hu sodda' este na kata gi i blog JungleWatch. I pine'lo siha gi este na blog, ma sen aguiguiyi unu na banda gi yinaoyao, lao meggai na infotmasion sinembatgo.
***********************
December 17, 2014
Dear Archbishop Apuron,
These
are undoubtedly trying times for the Catholic Church here in our
island. I am writing to you because I continue to be saddened by the
problems facing our beloved Church in Guam. It is undeniable that our
Archdiocese is clearly divided, and that many of our people are angry,
distraught, and confused by all the discord within our Church and among
our leaders. The people of the Archdiocese – and even the many in our
island community who are not Catholic but who are nonetheless concerned
for our island – are all looking to you to provide resolution, healing,
and closure. Unfortunately, rather than bringing about resolution,
healing, and closure, it is clear that information released by the
Chancery has only served to further inflame the situation rather than
quell it.
With
that said, I pray that you take what I am about to say positively, for
my sole intention is to offer my thoughts in an effort to foster
understanding, reconciliation, and ultimately the restoration of peace
and unity within our fractured Church. I understand that there are
numerous issues that need to be addressed, but I wanted to specifically
focus on the one area that I believe can be immediately improved: the
area of finances.
On this subject, I believe I am more than qualified to speak, as it has been my profession for well over 35 years. As you know, for the last thirteen years, I have been entrusted as the Chief Financial Officer of Calvo Enterprises, the largest locally owned company in Guam. Prior to that, I worked in the public sector as Director of the Bureau of Budget Management and Research for the Government of Guam, serving as the Chief Financial Advisor for three governors of Guam. In all of my previous positions, I have enjoyed the complete trust of my employers, who knew that I would always give my best professional advice.
Archbishop,
I believe you asked me to be a member of the Archdiocesan Finance
Council for this very reason. It was an office I served faithfully for
eight years. I always felt that you trusted that my advice was based on
what I believed to be in the best interest of our Church. If I were
still serving in this capacity, I would have advised you and the
Archdiocese to be extremely careful about appropriately dealing with
financial matters. I assure you that I mean this with no condescension,
but finances can be very complicated and difficult to understand, and
when someone other than trained professionals are allowed to make
financial interpretations and pronouncements without proper guidance,
errors are bound to be made. Unfortunately, some of these errors can
cause great harm to individuals, especially if a rush to judgment is
made without properly uncovering and understanding all the pertinent
facts. This is precisely what I believe has happened to Msgr. James
Benavente and all the good people who worked alongside him at the
Cathedral-Basilica and the Catholic Cemeteries.
As
an example, many negative things have been said about the loans made
for the unquestionably beautiful renovation of the Cathedral-Basilica
overseen by Msgr. James, implying that the Archdiocese is left saddled
with a huge and unreasonable debt. But once again, this is just the
opposite of what the facts clearly reflect.
It
is an irrefutable fact that even before securing financing for the
Cathedral-Basilica renovation project, Msgr. James did his homework and
first sought out and secured as much alternative funding for the project
as he could. He knew that the cost was going to be enormous – in
excess of $6.8 million – and he knew that he had to reduce that burden
to the greatest extent possible. He was creative and resourceful, and
in the end, more successful that we could have ever imagined. Msgr.
James secured over $3.555 million in cash contributions, which funded an
astounding 52% of the project.
Here
are the facts extracted from past correspondence of the Archdiocesan
Finance Officer to the Cathedral Basilica Parish Council:
- The total cost of the renovation was in excess of $6.8 million;
- Msgr. James secured Federal Funding for the project, totaling $2.14 million;
- Msgr. James secured Public Donations totaling $1.27 million;
- Msgr. James secured Contractor/Supplier Donations totaling $145,000.00
- Msgr. James had the Basilica Approved as a Federal Historic Preservation Site, which entitled it to certain grants and funding;
- Through consolidation with other loans, the interest rate was reduced to 4.125%;
- Project balance as of June 30, 2014 was only $1.73 million
Basilica Renovations
| |||
Original Cost
|
6,805,500.00
|
100.00%
| |
Government Grants
|
2,140,200.00
| ||
Contributions & Donations - General
|
1,270,000.00
| ||
Contributions & Donations - Contractors & Suppliers
|
145,300.00
| ||
3,555,500.00
|
52.24%
| ||
Current Rate
|
4.125%
| ||
Original Loan
|
3,250,000.00
| ||
Principal Paid through 06/30/2014
|
1,518,920.31
|
22.32%
| |
Principal Balance 06/30/2014
|
1,731,079.69
|
25.44%
|
As
your Finance Officer, Mr. Dominic Kim, has indicated in his
correspondence, the loan balance for this particular project is down
from $6.8 million to $1.7 million. This was possible only because Msgr.
James was able to fund so much of the project through his tireless
efforts at securing donations and alternate funding sources. Had this
not been the case, the loan balance would have been much, much larger,
and the monthly debt service requirement that much greater. For
illustration purposes, a $6.8 million loan amortized for thirty years at
an interest rate of 4.125% would still have had a balance of over $4.2
million, as compared to the actual balance of $1.7 million as stated
above.
Msgr.
James has proven time and time again that the people respond to his
call when he appeals to them for help in funding a particular need of
the Church. In addition to what I have mentioned above, I am also aware
of several other large donations secured by Msgr. James. For one, the
Chapel of St. Therese and the Museum at the Cathedral-Basilica were
built entirely through a donation secured by Msgr. James from two
prominent local families. Each donor contributed $1 million to the
Cathedral-Basilica for the Chapel of St. Therese and the Museum. I know
of no other person, religious or otherwise, who has been able to
successfully obtain in excess of $6 million in donations and
contributions for the Archdiocese in such a short period of time – and
all for the benefit of, and love for, our Church and her people.
Archbishop,
there is a basic business principle that “you have to spend money to
make money.” Some of the information released from the Chancery, both
verbal and written, have accused Msgr. James of being too excessive in
his expenditures while he was in charge of the Cathedral-Basilica and
the Catholic Cemeteries. My response to this, as a finance professional
and a devout Catholic of our island, is twofold. First, in order to be
completely fair and transparent about this issue, and before any
conclusions are drawn, Msgr. James is owed an opportunity to address and
respond to any findings before they are publicly released. Second, I
urge you to look at all the pertinent facts, in their entirety, and take
into consideration the millions of dollars that Msgr. James has been
able to secure on behalf of the Archdiocese during this same period.
This brings to mind an old business caveat: We must constantly guard
against being “pennywise and pound foolish.” Msgr. James spent a few
thousand dollars and, as a result, successfully brought in several
million dollars. That is an awesome return on the investment by any
standard.
The
point I am trying to make is this: It is critical to interpret all the
information correctly before any actions are considered. Prior to the
release of any financial information, great care is required to ensure
that the information is factual, accurate, and documented, and that the
decisions made and conclusions reached are reasoned, sound, and
supported by the information. This has not been happening with the
reports that have come out from the Archdiocese thus far. It is for
this reason that I am once again coming forward to express my concerns
regarding the misinformation that has been released by your financial
advisors. In particular, I believe that the release of financial
allegations regarding the Cathedral-Basilica and the Catholic Cemeteries
was, at best, poorly handled. I pray that you fully consider the great
harm that this misinformation continues to inflict – not just upon
Msgr. James and all those who worked closely with him at both of these
entities, but upon our beloved Church and the thousands of faithful who
are confused, disillusioned, and in many cases, outraged, by the
Chancery’s handling of this matter.
This
“mishandling” of the situation has been demonstrated many times over.
As one example, the memos released by the Archdiocese contained
information on items that had already been resolved, yet the memos were
written as though the problems persist. Even worse was the inclusion of
a false statement about securing Archdiocesan property as collateral
for the Catholic Cemeteries loan. This same position was also
incorrectly interpreted by the Archdiocesan Finance Officer, Mr. Dominic
Kim, well over two years ago in 2012, and was previously corrected back
then as well. Despite knowing the truth, you and your advisors
continue to erroneously cite this as a major offense committed by Msgr.
James. These items taken together painted a distorted and inaccurate
financial picture that disregarded all the documented and monumental
progress that had already been accomplished.
When
Msgr. James was first removed, your memos and public releases
selectively picked little snippets of information from the auditor’s
report and paraphrased them out of context, so that only the problems
were publicized while the fact that they were already resolved was
conveniently omitted. Is this not the same as lying?
Most people reading the auditor’s report will quickly recognize that
the document was intended as a sort of progress report that lists some
of the issues that were found, addresses how these issues were remedied,
and also recommends how to further improve the financial operations.
These
unsubstantiated accusations are a direct attack on the many, many
individuals who had been working diligently to shore up the financial
footing of both the Cathedral-Basilica and the Catholic Cemeteries.
These people worked hard because they all wanted to help. No one was
seeking to be publicly acknowledged or thanked, but when those releases
from the Chancery were published, you and your advisors effectively and unfairly called into question the integrity of all these individuals. To this day, no one has ever been given an opportunity to respond to the allegations.
I
cannot express more strenuously and emphatically that whenever one
deals with financial reviews of an entity, it is critically important to
conduct an interview process. The interviews are conducted to allow the
entity under review an opportunity to clarify the auditor’s
understanding of the facts and circumstances surrounding the findings
and to correct any misunderstandings and inaccuracies. The process of
obtaining the input and comments of the entity is a crucial step to
ensuring the accuracy and objectivity of the audit. Unfortunately, in
this situation, this step was skipped. It is my understanding that
additional information and allegations have continued to be released
selectively, once again without allowing the appropriate individuals an
opportunity to respond. I hope and pray that this is not true, because
not only is this dishonest, but it also goes contrary to the gospel that
you as Archbishop have been ordained to uphold. I hesitate to use this
word, but it somehow feels appropriate in this circumstance:
Archbishop, this feels evil.
On
a separate note, I want to state that I have had to bury two dear
family members this past year, so I have had direct and first-hand
experience dealing with both the previous Catholic Cemeteries personnel
under Msgr. James and the current Cemeteries staff and personnel. We
buried my mom in January of this year, and the staff and management of
the Catholic Cemeteries treated us with complete dignity, compassion,
and care. They performed their duties with the utmost professionalism.
My brother passed away this past September, and we thus had an
opportunity to work with the new Catholic Cemeteries staff and
management for his burial. While I acknowledge that the current staff
is trying, I must express that the work and the services they are
performing falls dramatically short of the standards established by
their predecessors under Msgr. James. I have a lot to say in this area,
including how my family and I were treated. But for now, I will
summarize my recent experiences by saying that there is an obvious and
striking decline in the level of service that is currently being
provided at the Catholic Cemeteries.
In
closing, I want to thank you for taking the time to read my lengthy
letter, and I trust that you will appreciate that its length is a direct
indication of how much consternation these recent events have caused
me, and how troubled I am about the fate of our island Church. Allow me
to conclude by reiterating that the manner with which Msgr. James
Benavente, his staff, and financial advisors were treated goes contrary
how Jesus instructs us to treat one another: “If your brother sins
against you, go and tell him his fault between you and him alone. If he
listens to you, you have won over your brother. If he does not listen,
take one or two others along with you, so that ‘every fact may be
established on the testimony of two or three witnesses.’” Archbishop,
please correct me if I am wrong, but from a layman’s point of view, I
expected you to practice as well as preach Matthew’s gospel. Instead,
with the public releases from your office, it appears that you did the
complete opposite of the gospel mandate.
I
am very troubled and confused that you falsely reported undocumented
mismanagement of the Cathedral-Basilica and Catholic Cemeteries to
various Archdiocesan bodies, and then – and only then
– did you call Msgr. James into your office to discuss these issues
with him. You never gave him the opportunity to defend himself, his
reputation, or the people who worked with him all these years.
Archbishop, all those people who worked with Msgr. James were working
as much for you as for him. They, and Msgr. James, were all your
soldiers in Christ, and they were loyal to you. They are all good,
intelligent people who believed that they were doing something valuable
and worthwhile for our Church. Those infamous releases alleging
financial mismanagement turned out to be a shocking and painful
awakening to all, and unfortunately, a call to action by many. Please,
Archbishop, this has to stop now.
As
you may be inclined to agree, I know of nothing good that can come out
of impugning a person’s good name. Archbishop, I am pleading with you
to begin the healing, and I pray that you can restore the close
relationship you once enjoyed with Msgr. James. In the spirit of the
Advent Season now upon us – as we prepare to receive the Baby Jesus, the
Prince of Peace – I pray that you will be for your people the agent of
peace and goodwill that our island faithful desperately need.
Joseph E. Rivera
Comments